You might remember him from this post where he performed another original composition. Charlie; Age 15, is a high school student who lives in California and has been diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome.
He is a singer/songwriter who plays guitar, accordion, and harmonica. He also designs websites and T-Shirts.

He and his band (and chickenly challenged teacher) were asked to perform to celebrate the opening of a record store, because they are talented musicians.
Not because they are Aspies. I like that.
I also like the Autism Genome Project which is supported by our own Trinity University here in Dublin. There is a link to the Newsletter Here on the IAA webpage.
We first got involved 7 years ago when Boo was barely 4 years old. They filmed him and did a lot of diagnostic stuff. And then took bloods from Me, Boo and Mr Hammie.
On Sunday night, they came back and put me and Mr H through a few vocabulary tests (very competitive we were too) and then took some more head measurements and a bit more blood. We made no promises but as it turned out, Boo happily came downstairs to meet Dr Gallagher and then sat between Mummy and Daddy while we put the "seat belt" on his arm and giggled through having his blood taken. Another 5 tubes to get them through the next few years.
We have a family history of autism so I feel pretty comfortable with the genetic research. And I figure if they can identify a clear genetic marker they can come up with a definitive test and save families a lot of heart ache and uncertainty when it comes to diagnosis.
And I must confess I do love a bit of empirically researched science.
I also took the opportunity to lecture the very lovely Dr on the madness of giving an ambiguous diagnosis like "P.D.D. -N.O.S" which seems to deny parents more services than actually help in anyway.
I realise that it might be easier for some people to hear that their child has a kind of "autism lite" but when it may delay access or even pre-clude eligibility to essential services and supports such as the Carers Allowances and Incapacitated Child Tax Allowance, along with "Classic" Autism services. Then it is just wrong.
If we had anything approaching an prescriptive health or educational response to different versions of autism, then I could see the point.
A little bird told me that even the excellent Tony Attwood disputes the benefits of such a label.
In Australia we would call it a "Claytons" Diagnosis - or "The Autism You're Having when You're not having Autism"
But it is genuinely in the Autistic Spectrum and should be labeled as such.
I have ranted about this before, so I won't bore you again, other than to say that a diagnosis is not a tattoo on your child's head. Assessments can be re-done, outlooks changed; but it all depends on intervention and access to services. The parent needs the ticket to get in the queue to get whatever it takes to secure intervention. Even if that is just a good tax rebate that will pay for private speech therapy. Whatever it takes, parents have to do it.
I have been told off for this but I will repeat it for the sake of getting people to Stand Up For Autism -
If it Looks like a duck, Sounds like a Duck and Smells like a Duck, chances are it is a duck. Don't call it a webbed footed, feathered and billed quacking creature, not otherwise specified.
Call it a feckin' duck and we can get started on securing some services!
xx














